25 Texas Cities With the Worst Tap Water (2026)

By Echo Water Research Team 10 min read
25 Texas Cities With the Worst Tap Water (2026)
25
Cities Analyzed
492
Total Contaminants Above Guidelines
728,460
People Affected

We analyzed tap water quality data for hundreds of cities in Texas to identify the 25 with the most contaminants exceeding health guidelines. This ranking is based on 2026 data from the EPA and EWG databases.

While all public water systems must meet EPA legal limits, many health experts — including the Environmental Working Group — argue that these legal limits are outdated and don't reflect current scientific understanding of safe exposure levels. The cities below have the widest gap between what's in their water and what's considered safe by modern health standards.

Methodology: Cities are ranked by the number of contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines (descending), with ties broken by total contaminants detected. Data sourced from the EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) and the Environmental Working Group (EWG) Tap Water Database. Only cities with available EWG testing data are included.
1

Coupland, Texas

Manville WSC • 39,648 people served
23Above EWG Guidelines
50Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneBromoformChloroformChromium (hexavalent)

Coupland has 23 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 50 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Coupland water report →
2

Galena Park, Texas

City of Galena Park • 10,293 people served
21Above EWG Guidelines
55Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Arsenic*Bromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneChloroformCyanide (free)Dibromoacetic acid

Galena Park has 21 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 55 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Galena Park water report →
3

Hamlin, Texas

City of Hamlin • 2,164 people served
21Above EWG Guidelines
41Total Detected
3Above Legal Limit
Arsenic*Bromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorite*Chloroform

Hamlin has 21 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 41 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Hamlin water report →
4

Lawn, Texas

City of Lawn • 767 people served
21Above EWG Guidelines
41Total Detected
3Above Legal Limit
NitrateNitrate and nitritePerfluoropentane sulfonic acid (PFPeS)*Uranium*Arsenic*Bromochloroacetic acid

Lawn has 21 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 41 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Lawn water report →
5

Forney, Texas

City of Forney • 27,040 people served
21Above EWG Guidelines
40Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Bromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorateChloroformChromium (hexavalent)

Forney has 21 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 40 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Forney water report →

Is your city on this list?

Get a free personalized water quality report for your address.

Check Your Water
6

Aledo, Texas

City of Aledo • 5,010 people served
20Above EWG Guidelines
48Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromate*Bromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneBromoformChloroform

Aledo has 20 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 48 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Aledo water report →
7

Florence, Texas

City of Florence • 1,136 people served
20Above EWG Guidelines
44Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
1,2,3-TrichloropropaneArsenicBromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneBromoformChloroform

Florence has 20 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 44 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Florence water report →
8

Terrell, Texas

City of Terrell • 18,897 people served
20Above EWG Guidelines
40Total Detected
1Above Legal Limit
Bromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneChlorateChloroformChromium (hexavalent)Dibromoacetic acid

Terrell has 20 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 40 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Terrell water report →
9

Little River Academy, Texas

Bell County Water Control and Improvement District 2 • 1,961 people served
20Above EWG Guidelines
37Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Bromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorate*Chlorite*Chloroform

Little River Academy has 20 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 37 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Little River Academy water report →
10

Hudson Oaks, Texas

City of Hudson Oaks • 3,154 people served
20Above EWG Guidelines
36Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Arsenic*Bromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorite*Chloroform

Hudson Oaks has 20 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 36 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Hudson Oaks water report →
11

Pasadena, Texas

City of Pasadena • 153,000 people served
19Above EWG Guidelines
60Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Arsenic*Bromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneBromoformChloroformDibromoacetic acid

Pasadena has 19 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 60 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Pasadena water report →
12

Webster, Texas

City of Webster • 13,710 people served
19Above EWG Guidelines
55Total Detected
1Above Legal Limit
Arsenic*Bromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneChloroformChromium (hexavalent)*Dibromoacetic acid

Webster has 19 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 55 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Webster water report →
13

Jacinto City, Texas

City of Jacinto City • 10,625 people served
19Above EWG Guidelines
53Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBenzeneBromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneChloroformChromium (hexavalent)*

Jacinto City has 19 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 53 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Jacinto City water report →
14

Shoreacres, Texas

City of Shoreacres • 1,493 people served
19Above EWG Guidelines
52Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Arsenic*Bromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneChloroformChromium (hexavalent)*Dibromoacetic acid

Shoreacres has 19 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 52 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Shoreacres water report →
15

Sugar Land, Texas

City of Sugar Land • 90,909 people served
19Above EWG Guidelines
42Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
6:2 Fluorotelomer Sulfonic Acid (6:2 FTSA)ArsenicAtrazineBromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneChlorite

Sugar Land has 19 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 42 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Sugar Land water report →
16

Huntsville, Texas

City of Huntsville • 55,019 people served
19Above EWG Guidelines
42Total Detected
1Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneBromoformChloroformChromium (hexavalent)

Huntsville has 19 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 42 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Huntsville water report →
17

Liberty Hill, Texas

City of Liberty Hill • 8,777 people served
19Above EWG Guidelines
42Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
1,2,3-Trichloropropane*Bromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneBromoformChloroformChromium (hexavalent)*

Liberty Hill has 19 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 42 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Liberty Hill water report →
18

Carrollton, Texas

City of Carrollton • 136,170 people served
19Above EWG Guidelines
41Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Bromate*Bromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneChloroformChromium (hexavalent)Dibromoacetic acid

Carrollton has 19 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 41 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Carrollton water report →
19

Tuscola, Texas

Steamboat Mountain Water Supply Corporation • 7,338 people served
19Above EWG Guidelines
41Total Detected
2Above Legal Limit
Arsenic*Bromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorite*Dibromoacetic acid

Tuscola has 19 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 41 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Tuscola water report →
20

Merkel, Texas

Sun Water Supply Corporation • 3,888 people served
19Above EWG Guidelines
41Total Detected
3Above Legal Limit
Arsenic*Bromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorite*Dibromoacetic acid

Merkel has 19 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 41 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Merkel water report →
21

Haslet, Texas

City of Haslet • 3,579 people served
19Above EWG Guidelines
41Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Arsenic*Bromate*Bromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneChloroformChromium (hexavalent)*

Haslet has 19 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 41 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Haslet water report →
22

Tye, Texas

City of Tye • 1,176 people served
19Above EWG Guidelines
41Total Detected
1Above Legal Limit
Arsenic*Bromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorite*Dibromoacetic acid

Tye has 19 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 41 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Tye water report →
23

Buffalo Gap, Texas

City of Buffalo Gap • 0 people served
19Above EWG Guidelines
41Total Detected
3Above Legal Limit
Arsenic*Bromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorite*Dibromoacetic acid

Buffalo Gap has 19 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 41 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Buffalo Gap water report →
24

Abilene, Texas

City of Abilene • 125,182 people served
19Above EWG Guidelines
40Total Detected
3Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneBromoformChloriteDibromoacetic acid

Abilene has 19 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 40 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Abilene water report →
25

Dyess Afb, Texas

Dyess Air Force Base • 7,524 people served
19Above EWG Guidelines
40Total Detected
3Above Legal Limit
Arsenic*Bromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorite*Chloroform

Dyess Afb has 19 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 40 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Dyess Afb water report →

What We Found: Key Patterns

The most frequently detected contaminants exceeding health guidelines across these cities are Bromochloroacetic acid, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromoacetic acid. These appear repeatedly across different water systems and regions.

Water quality varies significantly even within the same state, driven by local geology, agricultural activity, and industrial proximity.

Across all ranked cities, 492 contaminant readings exceed EWG health guidelines, but only 24 exceed EPA legal limits. This gap of 468 highlights how legal standards may not fully protect public health — EPA limits haven't been updated for many contaminants in decades.

Full Rankings Table

Rank City State Detected Above Guidelines Above Legal People Served
1 Coupland TX 50 23 0 39,648
2 Galena Park TX 55 21 0 10,293
3 Hamlin TX 41 21 3 2,164
4 Lawn TX 41 21 3 767
5 Forney TX 40 21 0 27,040
6 Aledo TX 48 20 0 5,010
7 Florence TX 44 20 0 1,136
8 Terrell TX 40 20 1 18,897
9 Little River Academy TX 37 20 0 1,961
10 Hudson Oaks TX 36 20 0 3,154
11 Pasadena TX 60 19 0 153,000
12 Webster TX 55 19 1 13,710
13 Jacinto City TX 53 19 0 10,625
14 Shoreacres TX 52 19 0 1,493
15 Sugar Land TX 42 19 0 90,909
16 Huntsville TX 42 19 1 55,019
17 Liberty Hill TX 42 19 0 8,777
18 Carrollton TX 41 19 0 136,170
19 Tuscola TX 41 19 2 7,338
20 Merkel TX 41 19 3 3,888
21 Haslet TX 41 19 0 3,579
22 Tye TX 41 19 1 1,176
23 Buffalo Gap TX 41 19 3 0
24 Abilene TX 40 19 3 125,182
25 Dyess Afb TX 40 19 3 7,524

Don't see your city?

Check your water quality now with a free personalized report.

Check Your Water

Frequently Asked Questions

What city has the worst tap water in Texas?

Based on 2026 data, Coupland, TX has the most contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines among the cities we analyzed.

How are cities ranked in this report?

Cities are ranked by the number of contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines. These guidelines are typically stricter than EPA legal limits and reflect current scientific research on safe exposure levels.

Is my tap water safe if my city isn't on this list?

Not necessarily. Even cities not on this list may have contaminants of concern. We recommend checking your specific water quality using our free water scan tool.

What's the best water filter for contaminated water?

A reverse osmosis (RO) system is the most effective for removing the widest range of contaminants. For whole-home protection, a combination of RO for drinking water and a whole-home filter for showers and baths is recommended.

Data sources: Environmental Working Group (EWG) Tap Water Database, U.S. EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS)

Last updated: April 2026

Methodology: Contaminant levels are compared against both EPA legal limits (Maximum Contaminant Levels) and EWG health guidelines, which are often stricter and based on the latest scientific research.

Share
Leave a comment

This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.