1,4-Dioxane* in Drinking Water
Found in 887 water systems • Detected
Updated March 2026 • Data from EWG & EPA
What is 1,4-Dioxane* and Why Does It Matter?
1,4-Dioxane is a synthetic industrial chemical that most people have never heard of — but it may be in your tap water right now. It's a byproduct that shows up in manufacturing processes for solvents, plastics, and surprisingly, some personal care products like shampoos and detergents. Factories that produce or use these materials often discharge wastewater containing 1,4-dioxane, and it moves through soil and into groundwater with ease. Unlike many contaminants, it doesn't bind well to soil particles, which means it travels fast and far from its original source.
The health picture for 1,4-dioxane is concerning. The EPA classifies it as a likely human carcinogen, meaning long-term exposure raises your cancer risk — particularly for the liver and kidneys, which bear the heaviest burden of filtering it from your body. The EWG (Environmental Working Group) sets its health guideline at just 0.35 parts per billion (ppb), a level based on a one-in-a-million cancer risk over a lifetime of exposure. At higher concentrations, animal studies show liver damage and respiratory irritation. Children and pregnant women face heightened concern because their bodies are more vulnerable to chemical exposures during critical development windows.
Right now, the EPA has no enforceable federal limit — called a Maximum Contaminant Level — for 1,4-dioxane in drinking water. That's a significant gap in protection. The EWG's health guideline of 0.35 ppb is far more protective than what most utilities are required to monitor or report. Across 887 water systems tested nationally, the average detected level was 0.216 ppb — close to the EWG threshold. More alarming, 87 of those systems reported levels above the EWG guideline, with the highest recorded sample reaching 5.83 ppb, more than 16 times the health guideline. Without a federal standard forcing utilities to act, many systems have little regulatory pressure to address it.
Geography tells an important part of this story. North Carolina leads the country with 106 affected systems, followed by New York (91), Texas (88), Illinois (79), and Ohio (69). These states share something in common: a dense history of industrial manufacturing. North Carolina's Research Triangle region, for example, has documented 1,4-dioxane contamination tied to pharmaceutical and chemical plants. New York's contamination clusters around Long Island and older manufacturing corridors. Texas and Ohio have large petrochemical and plastics industries that have contributed to groundwater contamination over decades. If you live in or near industrial areas in these states, your risk of exposure is meaningfully higher than the national average.
The good news is that effective filtration options exist. Standard carbon filters — the kind found in many pitcher filters and refrigerator systems — do not remove 1,4-dioxane effectively. It's a small, water-soluble molecule that slips right through activated carbon. Advanced oxidation processes and high-pressure reverse osmosis are the most reliable removal methods at the municipal level. For your home, a certified reverse osmosis (RO) system is your best defense. RO systems force water through a semi-permeable membrane that blocks contaminants at the molecular level, and quality systems can remove 1,4-dioxane to below detectable levels. Echo Water's reverse osmosis systems are independently tested to address contaminants like 1,4-dioxane that standard filters miss. If you're in one of the high-impact states, checking your local water quality report — called a Consumer Confidence Report — is a smart first step. Then pair that knowledge with a filtration system that's actually built for the job.
Regulatory Standards for 1,4-Dioxane*
| Standard | Level | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| EWG Health Guideline | 0.35 ppb | Stricter, based on latest science |
| Average Detected Level | 0.22 ppb | Across all tested systems |
| Highest Detected Level | 5.83 ppb | Worst-case system |
Cities With the Highest 1,4-Dioxane* Levels
| # | City | Detected Level | People Served |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Charlotte, NC | 5.83 ppb | 4,270 |
| 2 | Broadway, NC | 5.83 ppb | 1,783 |
| 3 | Pittsboro, NC | 5.83 ppb | 1,437 |
| 4 | Goldston, NC | 5.83 ppb | 1,285 |
| 5 | Lillington, NC | 3.55 ppb | 3,883 |
| 6 | Fort Liberty, NC | 3.55 ppb | 3,733 |
| 7 | Coats, NC | 3.55 ppb | 2,831 |
| 8 | Linden, NC | 3.55 ppb | 2,077 |
| 9 | Lillington, NC | 3.55 ppb | 629 |
| 10 | Fuquay-varina, NC | 3.55 ppb | 50 |
| 11 | Denver, NC | 3.55 ppb | 1,945 |
| 12 | Angier, NC | 3.55 ppb | 8,468 |
| 13 | Carthage, NC | 3.55 ppb | 7,990 |
| 14 | Carthage, NC | 3.55 ppb | 165 |
| 15 | Denver, NC | 3.55 ppb | 108 |
States Most Affected by 1,4-Dioxane*
How to Remove 1,4-Dioxane* From Your Water
Reverse osmosis (RO) systems are generally the most effective at removing a wide range of contaminants from drinking water.
Standard pitcher filters and carbon-only filters do not reliably remove 1,4-Dioxane*. A reverse osmosis system with NSF/ANSI 58 certification is the most reliable solution.
Echo RO System
Removes 1,4-Dioxane* and 99.9% of other contaminants. The gold standard for drinking water purification.
View RO SystemsEcho Hydrogen Water Flask
Once your water is clean, supercharge it with molecular hydrogen for antioxidant benefits.
Shop Hydrogen FlaskFrequently Asked Questions
Is 1,4-Dioxane* in my drinking water?
1,4-Dioxane* was detected in 887 water systems across the US. Check your city's water quality report to see if it affects your water supply.
What are the health effects of 1,4-Dioxane* in water?
1,4-Dioxane* has been associated with various health concerns at elevated levels. The EWG has set health guidelines that are typically stricter than EPA legal limits.
Which city has the most 1,4-Dioxane* in its water?
Based on our analysis, Charlotte, NC has the highest detected levels of 1,4-Dioxane* in its water supply.
How do I remove 1,4-Dioxane* from my water?
Reverse osmosis (RO) systems are generally the most effective at removing this contaminant. Check the filtration recommendations section for specific guidance.
Related Contaminant Guides
Data sources: Environmental Working Group (EWG) Tap Water Database, U.S. EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS)
Last updated: March 2026
Methodology: Contaminant levels are compared against both EPA legal limits (Maximum Contaminant Levels) and EWG health guidelines, which are often stricter and based on the latest scientific research.