Trichlorotrifluoroethane in Drinking Water
Found in 15 water systems • vocs
Updated March 2026 • Data from EWG & EPA
What is Trichlorotrifluoroethane and Why Does It Matter?
Trichlorotrifluoroethane (also called CFC-113 or Freon 113) is a synthetic chemical that was once widely used as an industrial solvent and refrigerant. For decades, electronics manufacturers used it to clean circuit boards and metal parts. It also appeared in aerosol propellants and fire suppressants. When these products were improperly disposed of or leaked from industrial sites, the chemical made its way into soil and eventually into groundwater. From there, it can reach municipal water supplies and private wells.
Health researchers have studied CFC-113 primarily in the context of workplace exposure, where workers inhaled large amounts. At high concentrations, the chemical affects the central nervous system, causing dizziness, confusion, and in severe cases, cardiac arrhythmia (irregular heartbeat). Long-term low-level exposure through drinking water is less studied, but the chemical belongs to a class of chlorinated solvents that raise concern for liver and kidney stress over time. The EPA has not classified CFC-113 as a known human carcinogen, but that doesn't mean ongoing exposure is without risk — especially for children and pregnant women, whose bodies are more vulnerable to chemical disruption.
The EPA has set a maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 1,200 parts per billion (ppb) for trichlorotrifluoroethane in drinking water. That number is extremely high compared to most regulated contaminants, which means it was designed to address acute industrial spills rather than everyday low-level exposure. No water systems in the current dataset exceeded that legal limit. The average detected level across the 15 affected systems was 1.184 ppb, and the highest single measurement came in at 8.76 ppb — still well below the EPA threshold. However, the EPA limit reflects what's technically enforceable, not necessarily what's safe for daily consumption over a lifetime. Independent health researchers often recommend treating any detectable level of a synthetic industrial solvent as a reason to filter your water.
Geographically, New York and California each account for 5 of the 15 water systems where this chemical was detected. Wisconsin follows with 3 systems, while Utah and Minnesota each report 1. That pattern makes sense when you consider industrial history. New York's Hudson Valley and Long Island have well-documented legacies of electronics manufacturing and military base contamination. California's Silicon Valley was built on semiconductor production, which relied heavily on solvents like CFC-113 for decades. Wisconsin's manufacturing corridor adds another layer of industrial exposure. These aren't random detections — they trace back to specific industries that operated in these regions for generations and left chemical footprints in the ground.
The good news is that CFC-113 responds well to filtration. Activated carbon filters, particularly those using granular activated carbon (GAC) or solid carbon block technology, are effective at reducing chlorinated solvents from drinking water. A reverse osmosis (ROS) system goes even further, removing a broad range of synthetic chemicals including CFC-113 at the point of use — meaning right at your tap. If you live in New York, California, or Wisconsin and your water comes from a municipal system with an industrial past, it's worth pulling your annual water quality report (called a Consumer Confidence Report) to check for this and similar solvents. Echo Water's filtration systems use multi-stage carbon and reverse osmosis technology specifically designed to reduce synthetic industrial chemicals like these. At detected levels this low, you're not facing an emergency — but filtering your drinking water is a smart, straightforward step that removes the uncertainty entirely.
Regulatory Standards for Trichlorotrifluoroethane
| Standard | Level | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| EWG Health Guideline | 4,000 ppb | Stricter, based on latest science |
| Average Detected Level | 1.18 ppb | Across all tested systems |
| Highest Detected Level | 8.76 ppb | Worst-case system |
Cities With the Highest Trichlorotrifluoroethane Levels
| # | City | Detected Level | People Served |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Magna, UT | 8.76 ppb | 32,100 |
| 2 | San Bernardino, CA | 5 ppb | 109,608 |
| 3 | Stevens Point, WI | 1.20 ppb | 24,551 |
| 4 | Greenlawn, NY | 0.70 ppb | 42,000 |
| 5 | Huntington, NY | 0.51 ppb | 34,522 |
| 6 | Franklin Square, NY | 0.43 ppb | 20,000 |
| 7 | Pauma Valley, CA | 0.34 ppb | 769 |
| 8 | Austin, MN | 0.33 ppb | 59 |
| 9 | Grafton, WI | 0.30 ppb | 11,745 |
| 10 | San Jose, CA | 0.11 ppb | 108,902 |
| 11 | Merrick, NY | 0.06 ppb | 177,000 |
| 12 | Plainview, NY | 0.01 ppb | 35,000 |
| 13 | Madison, WI | 0.01 ppb | 235,000 |
| 14 | Portola, CA | 0 ppb | 215 |
| 15 | Weed, CA | 0 ppb | 143 |
States Most Affected by Trichlorotrifluoroethane
How to Remove Trichlorotrifluoroethane From Your Water
CFC-113 is highly volatile and lipophilic, making it moderately removable by activated carbon in standard filters (50-75% removal). However, pitcher filters provide incomplete removal due to short contact time.
Standard pitcher filters and carbon block filters can provide some reduction of Trichlorotrifluoroethane, though effectiveness varies by brand and flow rate. For maximum protection, a certified RO system is recommended.
Activated carbon provides moderate removal; reverse osmosis or air stripping combined with GAC achieves >98% removal. Pitcher filters are marginally effective.
Echo RO System
Removes Trichlorotrifluoroethane and 99.9% of other contaminants. The gold standard for drinking water purification.
View RO SystemsEcho Hydrogen Water Flask
Once your water is clean, supercharge it with molecular hydrogen for antioxidant benefits.
Shop Hydrogen FlaskFrequently Asked Questions
Is Trichlorotrifluoroethane in my drinking water?
Trichlorotrifluoroethane was detected in 15 water systems across the US. Check your city's water quality report to see if it affects your water supply.
What are the health effects of Trichlorotrifluoroethane in water?
Trichlorotrifluoroethane has been associated with various health concerns at elevated levels. The EWG has set health guidelines that are typically stricter than EPA legal limits.
Which city has the most Trichlorotrifluoroethane in its water?
Based on our analysis, Magna, UT has the highest detected levels of Trichlorotrifluoroethane in its water supply.
How do I remove Trichlorotrifluoroethane from my water?
Reverse osmosis (RO) systems are generally the most effective at removing this contaminant. Check the filtration recommendations section for specific guidance.
Related Contaminant Guides
Data sources: Environmental Working Group (EWG) Tap Water Database, U.S. EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS)
Last updated: March 2026
Methodology: Contaminant levels are compared against both EPA legal limits (Maximum Contaminant Levels) and EWG health guidelines, which are often stricter and based on the latest scientific research.