25 Cities With the Most Strontium in Drinking Water (2026)

By Echo Water Research Team 8 min read
25 Cities With the Most Strontium in Drinking Water (2026)
25
Cities Analyzed
273
Total Contaminants Above Guidelines
1,005,638
People Affected

We analyzed tap water quality data for hundreds of cities across the United States to identify those with the highest levels of strontium. This ranking is based on 2026 data from the EPA and EWG databases.

Strontium is a contaminant of growing concern in drinking water. The cities below have the highest detected levels based on the most recent testing data available.

Methodology: Cities are ranked by the detected level of strontium (descending), showing those with the highest concentrations first. Data sourced from the EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) and the Environmental Working Group (EWG) Tap Water Database. Only cities with available EWG testing data are included.
1

Somonauk, Illinois

Somonauk • 1,786 people served
5Above EWG Guidelines
12Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ChloroformDichloroacetic acidHaloacetic acids (HAA5)Radium, combined (-226 and -228)Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Somonauk has strontium detected at 162 ppb. 12 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

2

Creve Coeur, Illinois

Creve Coeur • 0 people served
12Above EWG Guidelines
17Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
BromodichloromethaneBromoformDibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethaneHaloacetic acids (HAA5)Nitrate

Creve Coeur has strontium detected at 157 ppb. 17 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

3

Palmer, Illinois

Palmer • 229 people served
6Above EWG Guidelines
10Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
BromodichloromethaneChloroformDibromochloromethaneNitrateTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs)Bromoform

Palmer has strontium detected at 143 ppb. 10 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

4

Cowden, Illinois

Cowden • 612 people served
7Above EWG Guidelines
12Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
BromodichloromethaneBromoformDibromochloromethaneNitrateNitrate and nitriteTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Cowden has strontium detected at 140 ppb. 12 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

5

Mt. Auburn, Illinois

Mount Auburn • 480 people served
13Above EWG Guidelines
17Total Detected
1Above Legal Limit
BromodichloromethaneBromoformChloroformDibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic acid

Mt. Auburn has strontium detected at 119 ppb. 17 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

Is your city on this list?

Get a free personalized water quality report for your address.

Check Your Water
6

Fox Lake, Illinois

Hilldale Manor Subdivision • 414 people served
10Above EWG Guidelines
13Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
BromodichloromethaneBromoformChloroformDibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic acid

Fox Lake has strontium detected at 111 ppb. 13 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

7

Millerton, New York

Millerton Village • 2,000 people served
4Above EWG Guidelines
11Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
NitratePerfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS)Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)Radon

Millerton has strontium detected at 111 ppb. 11 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

8

Lacon, Illinois

Lacon • 1,878 people served
6Above EWG Guidelines
11Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
BromodichloromethaneChloroformHaloacetic acids (HAA5)NitrateNitrate and nitriteTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Lacon has strontium detected at 110 ppb. 11 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

9

Albany, Illinois

Albany • 950 people served
10Above EWG Guidelines
17Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
BromodichloromethaneBromoformChloroformDibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic acid

Albany has strontium detected at 98.10 ppb. 17 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

10

Carle Place, New York

Carle Place Water District • 9,005 people served
16Above EWG Guidelines
44Total Detected
2Above Legal Limit
6:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonate (6 2FTS)ArsenicChromium (hexavalent)NitrateNitrate and nitritePerfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoA)

Carle Place has strontium detected at 42.90 ppb. 44 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

11

Baldwin City, Kansas

Baldwin City, City of • 4,700 people served
16Above EWG Guidelines
32Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Arsenic*BromodichloromethaneBromoformChloroformChromium (hexavalent)*Dibromoacetic acid

Baldwin City has strontium detected at 38.20 ppb. 32 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

12

Lawrence, Kansas

City of Lawrence • 95,256 people served
9Above EWG Guidelines
23Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicChromium (hexavalent)Haloacetic acids (HAA5)Haloacetic acids (HAA9)Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS)Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Lawrence has strontium detected at 38.20 ppb. 23 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

13

Sandy, Utah

Sandy City Water System • 99,750 people served
14Above EWG Guidelines
23Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Bromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneChloroformChromium (hexavalent)Dibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethane

Sandy has strontium detected at 26.60 ppb. 23 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

14

Wood River, Illinois

Wood River • 10,464 people served
15Above EWG Guidelines
27Total Detected
1Above Legal Limit
BromodichloromethaneChloroformChromium (hexavalent)Dibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic acid

Wood River has strontium detected at 24.50 ppb. 27 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

15

Kansas City, Missouri

Kansas City • 513,800 people served
11Above EWG Guidelines
22Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
BromodichloromethaneChloroformChromium (hexavalent)Dibromoacetic acidDichloroacetic acidHaloacetic acids (HAA5)

Kansas City has strontium detected at 23.80 ppb. 22 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Kansas City water report →
16

Waldron, Missouri

Platte County Cons Public Water Supply District 1 • 6,900 people served
11Above EWG Guidelines
22Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
BromodichloromethaneChloroformChromium (hexavalent)*Dibromoacetic acid*Dichloroacetic acidHaloacetic acids (HAA5)

Waldron has strontium detected at 23.80 ppb. 22 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

17

Peculiar, Missouri

Peculiar PWS • 5,000 people served
11Above EWG Guidelines
23Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
BromodichloromethaneChloroformChromium (hexavalent)*Dibromoacetic acid*Dichloroacetic acidHaloacetic acids (HAA5)

Peculiar has strontium detected at 23.80 ppb. 23 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

18

Weatherby Lake, Missouri

Weatherby Lake PWS • 2,077 people served
11Above EWG Guidelines
22Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
BromodichloromethaneChloroformChromium (hexavalent)*Dibromoacetic acid*Dichloroacetic acidHaloacetic acids (HAA5)

Weatherby Lake has strontium detected at 23.80 ppb. 22 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

19

Ferrelview, Missouri

Ferrelview PWS • 850 people served
11Above EWG Guidelines
22Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
BromodichloromethaneChloroformChromium (hexavalent)*Dibromoacetic acid*Dichloroacetic acidHaloacetic acids (HAA5)

Ferrelview has strontium detected at 23.80 ppb. 22 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

20

Dearborn, Missouri

Dearborn PWS • 529 people served
11Above EWG Guidelines
22Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
BromodichloromethaneChloroformChromium (hexavalent)*Dibromoacetic acid*Dichloroacetic acidHaloacetic acids (HAA5)

Dearborn has strontium detected at 23.80 ppb. 22 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

21

Northmoor, Missouri

Northmoor PWS • 328 people served
11Above EWG Guidelines
22Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
BromodichloromethaneChloroformChromium (hexavalent)*Dibromoacetic acid*Dichloroacetic acidHaloacetic acids (HAA5)

Northmoor has strontium detected at 23.80 ppb. 22 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

22

Birmingham, Missouri

Birmingham Village of • 200 people served
11Above EWG Guidelines
22Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
BromodichloromethaneChloroformChromium (hexavalent)*Dibromoacetic acid*Dichloroacetic acidHaloacetic acids (HAA5)

Birmingham has strontium detected at 23.80 ppb. 22 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

23

Camden Point, Missouri

Platte County Public Water Supply District 2 • 0 people served
11Above EWG Guidelines
22Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
BromodichloromethaneChloroformChromium (hexavalent)*Dibromoacetic acid*Dichloroacetic acidHaloacetic acids (HAA5)

Camden Point has strontium detected at 23.80 ppb. 22 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

24

Madison, Wisconsin

Madison Water Utility • 235,000 people served
20Above EWG Guidelines
54Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
BromodichloromethaneChloroformChromium (hexavalent)Dibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic acid

Madison has strontium detected at 22.10 ppb. 54 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

25

Kaukauna, Wisconsin

Kaukauna Utilities • 13,430 people served
11Above EWG Guidelines
22Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
BromodichloromethaneChloroformDibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic acidHaloacetic acids (HAA5)

Kaukauna has strontium detected at 22.10 ppb. 22 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

What We Found: Key Patterns

The most frequently detected contaminants exceeding health guidelines across these cities are Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs), Chloroform, Haloacetic acids (HAA5). These appear repeatedly across different water systems and regions.

Geographically, the states most represented in this ranking are Illinois (9), Missouri (9), New York (2). Regional water sources, industrial activity, and agricultural runoff all contribute to local water quality variation.

Across all ranked cities, 273 contaminant readings exceed EWG health guidelines, but only 4 exceed EPA legal limits. This gap of 269 highlights how legal standards may not fully protect public health — EPA limits haven't been updated for many contaminants in decades.

Full Rankings Table

Rank City State Detected Above Guidelines Above Legal People Served
1 Somonauk IL 12 5 0 1,786
2 Creve Coeur IL 17 12 0 0
3 Palmer IL 10 6 0 229
4 Cowden IL 12 7 0 612
5 Mt. Auburn IL 17 13 1 480
6 Fox Lake IL 13 10 0 414
7 Millerton NY 11 4 0 2,000
8 Lacon IL 11 6 0 1,878
9 Albany IL 17 10 0 950
10 Carle Place NY 44 16 2 9,005
11 Baldwin City KS 32 16 0 4,700
12 Lawrence KS 23 9 0 95,256
13 Sandy UT 23 14 0 99,750
14 Wood River IL 27 15 1 10,464
15 Kansas City MO 22 11 0 513,800
16 Waldron MO 22 11 0 6,900
17 Peculiar MO 23 11 0 5,000
18 Weatherby Lake MO 22 11 0 2,077
19 Ferrelview MO 22 11 0 850
20 Dearborn MO 22 11 0 529
21 Northmoor MO 22 11 0 328
22 Birmingham MO 22 11 0 200
23 Camden Point MO 22 11 0 0
24 Madison WI 54 20 0 235,000
25 Kaukauna WI 22 11 0 13,430

Don't see your city?

Check your water quality now with a free personalized report.

Check Your Water

Frequently Asked Questions

What cities have the highest levels of strontium?

Our analysis of 2026 data identified the cities with the highest detected levels of strontium. See the full ranking above.

Is strontium dangerous in drinking water?

Strontium has known health risks at elevated levels. The EWG sets health guidelines that are often stricter than EPA legal limits to account for the latest research on long-term exposure.

How do I remove strontium from my water?

Reverse osmosis (RO) systems are the most effective at removing a wide range of contaminants. Check the specific contaminant details for recommended filtration technology.

What is the EPA legal limit for strontium?

EPA legal limits vary by contaminant and may differ from EWG health guidelines. See individual city reports for specific legal limit comparisons.

Data sources: Environmental Working Group (EWG) Tap Water Database, U.S. EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS)

Last updated: September 2026

Methodology: Contaminant levels are compared against both EPA legal limits (Maximum Contaminant Levels) and EWG health guidelines, which are often stricter and based on the latest scientific research.

Share
Leave a comment

This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.