2-propen-1-ol * in Drinking Water
Found in 22 water systems • Detected
Updated March 2026 • Data from EWG & EPA
What is 2-propen-1-ol * and Why Does It Matter?
2-Propen-1-ol, commonly known as allyl alcohol, is an industrial chemical that shows up in drinking water more often than most people realize. It's a colorless liquid with a sharp, pungent smell, used primarily in the production of resins, plastics, and pharmaceuticals. Allyl alcohol can enter water supplies through industrial discharge, chemical manufacturing runoff, and the breakdown of certain pesticides in soil. Once it reaches groundwater or surface water sources, it can persist long enough to make its way through treatment plants and into your tap.
Current data shows allyl alcohol has been detected in 22 water systems across the United States. The average concentration found is 0.106 parts per billion (ppb), with the highest recorded level reaching 0.181 ppb. These numbers are relatively low, and none of the 22 affected systems tested above established health guidelines. That's genuinely reassuring — but detection still matters. Even trace amounts of industrial chemicals in drinking water are worth understanding, especially for households with young children, pregnant women, or people with compromised immune systems.
Health research on allyl alcohol paints a cautious picture. At high doses, it is toxic — animal studies show it can damage the liver and irritate the eyes, skin, and respiratory tract. The EPA classifies it as a hazardous substance under the Clean Water Act. At the low concentrations found in drinking water, no direct human health effects have been conclusively documented. However, the EPA and environmental health researchers generally recommend applying a precautionary approach to any synthetic industrial chemical in drinking water, particularly for long-term, low-level exposure. The honest answer is that science doesn't yet have a complete picture of what chronic micro-dose exposure means for human health over decades.
Geographically, Illinois leads the country with 9 water systems detecting allyl alcohol. Colorado follows with 4, and Nebraska and Louisiana each report 3 affected systems. Florida accounts for 2. This pattern isn't random. Illinois and Louisiana both have significant industrial and chemical manufacturing corridors near major waterways. Nebraska's agricultural activity involves pesticide use that can contribute to chemical runoff. Colorado's detections likely tie to industrial operations along the Front Range. These regional patterns suggest that proximity to manufacturing zones and intensive agriculture increases the likelihood of detection — not necessarily at dangerous levels, but at levels worth monitoring.
The good news is that allyl alcohol is very removable with the right filtration. Activated carbon filters — the kind found in many under-sink and countertop systems — are effective at reducing volatile organic compounds (VOCs) like allyl alcohol. Reverse osmosis (RO) systems go even further, removing up to 99% of dissolved contaminants, including industrial chemicals at these concentration ranges. If you live in Illinois, Colorado, Nebraska, Louisiana, or Florida and want peace of mind, an under-sink reverse osmosis system is one of the most reliable options available. Echo Water's RO systems are independently tested to NSF/ANSI standards, which means the performance claims are verified — not just marketing. At minimum, check your local water quality report (called a Consumer Confidence Report, or CCR) to see whether allyl alcohol has been detected in your specific system. Your utility is required to publish this annually, and it's usually available on their website.
Regulatory Standards for 2-propen-1-ol *
| Standard | Level | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Average Detected Level | 0.11 ppb | Across all tested systems |
| Highest Detected Level | 0.18 ppb | Worst-case system |
Cities With the Highest 2-propen-1-ol * Levels
| # | City | Detected Level | People Served |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orlando, FL | 0.18 ppb | 969 |
| 2 | Orlando, FL | 0.18 ppb | 189 |
| 3 | Chicago Ridge, IL | 0.15 ppb | 14,130 |
| 4 | Country Club Hills, IL | 0.15 ppb | 16,511 |
| 5 | Palos Park, IL | 0.15 ppb | 4,899 |
| 6 | Matteson, IL | 0.15 ppb | 21,000 |
| 7 | Oak Forest, IL | 0.15 ppb | 26,547 |
| 8 | Olympia Fields, IL | 0.15 ppb | 4,988 |
| 9 | Orland Park, IL | 0.15 ppb | 58,862 |
| 10 | Palos Hills, IL | 0.15 ppb | 17,484 |
| 11 | Tinley Park, IL | 0.15 ppb | 56,703 |
| 12 | Ponchatoula, LA | 0.11 ppb | 57 |
| 13 | Madisonville, LA | 0.11 ppb | 894 |
| 14 | Aurora, CO | 0.08 ppb | 302 |
| 15 | Aurora, CO | 0.08 ppb | 842 |
States Most Affected by 2-propen-1-ol *
How to Remove 2-propen-1-ol * From Your Water
Reverse osmosis (RO) systems are generally the most effective at removing a wide range of contaminants from drinking water.
Echo RO System
Removes 2-propen-1-ol * and 99.9% of other contaminants. The gold standard for drinking water purification.
View RO SystemsEcho Hydrogen Water Flask
Once your water is clean, supercharge it with molecular hydrogen for antioxidant benefits.
Shop Hydrogen FlaskFrequently Asked Questions
Is 2-propen-1-ol * in my drinking water?
2-propen-1-ol * was detected in 22 water systems across the US. Check your city's water quality report to see if it affects your water supply.
What are the health effects of 2-propen-1-ol * in water?
2-propen-1-ol * has been associated with various health concerns at elevated levels. The EWG has set health guidelines that are typically stricter than EPA legal limits.
Which city has the most 2-propen-1-ol * in its water?
Based on our analysis, Orlando, FL has the highest detected levels of 2-propen-1-ol * in its water supply.
How do I remove 2-propen-1-ol * from my water?
Reverse osmosis (RO) systems are generally the most effective at removing this contaminant. Check the filtration recommendations section for specific guidance.
Related Contaminant Guides
Data sources: Environmental Working Group (EWG) Tap Water Database, U.S. EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS)
Last updated: March 2026
Methodology: Contaminant levels are compared against both EPA legal limits (Maximum Contaminant Levels) and EWG health guidelines, which are often stricter and based on the latest scientific research.